Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

A COMPARISON OF THE FIDELITY BETWEEN VARIOUS CORES FABRICATED WITH CAD/CAM SYSTEMS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 46±Ç 3È£ p.269 ~ 279
¹Ú¼±Èñ, À̱Ժ¹,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Ú¼±Èñ ( Park Sun-Hee ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
À̱Ժ¹ ( Lee Kyu-Bok ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Statement of Problem: Recently, various all-ceramic crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM systems have come into wide use in dental clinic. However, there are only few domestic studies on CAD/CAM restorations.

Purpose: Purpose of this study was to compare the fidelity (absolute marginal discrepancy and internal gap) between various cores fabricated with different CAD/CAM systems (Procera system, Lava system, Cerec inLab system) and conventional metal cast core.

Materials and Methods:10 cores per each system were fabricated. The absolute marginal discrepancies were measured using measuring microscope and digital counter. The internal gaps were calculated using a silicone paste. The results were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test and Tukey¡¯s HSD test.

Results: Within the limits of this study the results were as follows. 1. The absolute marginal discrepancies were 32.5¡¾3.7 §­ for metal cast core, 72.2¡¾7.0 §­ for Procera core, 40.8¡¾5.4 §­ for Lava core, and 55.3¡¾8.7 §­ for Cerec inLab core. The internal gaps were 38.4¡¾ 5.7 §­ for metal cast core, 71.4¡¾5.3 §­ for Procera core, 45.9¡¾7.3 §­ for Lava core, and 51.8¡¾6.2 §­ for Cerec inLab core. 2. The fidelity of metal cast core showed the smallest gaps, followed by Lava core, Cerec inLab core, and Procera core.

Conclusion: The fidelities of 4 core groups were all within the clinically acceptable range (120 §­).

Å°¿öµå

All-ceramic crown;CAD/CAM system;Absolute marginal discrepancy;Internal gap

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed